If you experiment with the mic/line gain you can find some nice sweet spots for your mics. The UAD seems to put more of an emphasis on an older-style analog (and noisier) reproduction. OK, did you do it? As you can see there are lots of differences!Īll of these plugins sound good, I just lay awake at night wondering which actually sounds most like an original 1073. ![]() (And compare it to the I K Multimedia TR5 EQ-73 as well.) In other words, it is easy to use and sounds great.īefore you do anything else – compare the UAD plugin to the Waves plugin here and read a little about what Andrew Scheps has to say about the Waves version. ![]() The stepped mic/line control makes for easy recall of settings to match mics or DIs. The EQ curves are musical (fancy way of saying sloped and not too steep). The three band EQ provides enough, without overwhelming you with options. (Of course, you can make it distort if you want!) One defining characteristic is that the input and output stages are at full power all the time, meaning it provides a very accurate response with little distortion. It certainly has taken on a life of its own. ![]() Rupert Neve designed the 1073 in 1970 to be used as a module in Neve mixing boards. The UAD Neve 1073 is an emulation of perhaps the most iconic of all preamps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |